Audi F1 livery concept revealed ahead of 2026 debut
November 14, 2025
Formula 1 Grand Prix Drivers Association chairman Alex Wurz has defended the FIA jewellery ban, but admitted he might have adopted a “slightly different approach.”
Following the exposure of a growing number of contentious grey areas in F1 regulations, the FIA has chosen a black-and-white approach to the regulations.
The tightening of the regulations, however, has sparked further debate, with Lewis Hamilton and Sebastian Vettel both speaking out against restrictions on the wearing of jewellery and non-compliant underwear, with the four-time world champion implying that his former title rival was being targeted by the governing body.
The rule banning drivers from wearing certain forms of jewellery, as well as flammable undergarments, has been in effect since 2005, albeit it is only loosely enforced. The FIA has just recently tightened its grip, with fines levied during a recent Formula E event.
Hamilton has been given a grace period to remove his own jewellery and must arrive at the Monaco Grand Prix weekend with no piercings or earrings, but he has vowed to disregard the deadline.
This has put Hamilton and the governing body at odds, with the FIA jewellery ban and the risks drivers face suddenly becoming a significant discussion point.
Lewis Hamilton boycotts F1 crackdown on jewellery
Hamilton says jewellery ban is ‘a step backwards’
Vettel boycotts F1 ruling on fireproof clothing by stepping out with a grey underwear
“It is a rule for the right reasons,” GPDA chairman Alex Wurz said in an interview with Reuters. “I would have probably liked a slightly different approach of how to deliver the message.
“I don’t want to end up in football where there are more hands in the air and verbal abuse…you have to work together. It’s a style I would have preferred in this case.”
While jewellery and underwear may appear to be minor concerns, Wurz cited a talk with former racer Kris Nissen, who was engaged in a fiery sportscar disaster at Fuji in 1988, as testimony to the contrary.
“He showed his body and said ‘look at this’,” said Wurz. “For him the absolute most painful thing after the fire, and it wasn’t a long fire, was the rubber [elastic] in his normal pants being burnt into the skin.”
“He said [it was] for years agony and pain, and it educated me.”
“At this moment I said I don’t want to live these consequences, only for [not] taking my pants off and putting fireproof underpants on. The same with jewellery.”
READ MORE:
F1 Drivers’ wives and girlfriends: Who are current Formula 1 stars dating?
F1 driver net worth 2025: The 12 richest drivers on the grid
